michael said:
If there even is a type of policy that will do this, I suspect it would cost far more than the interest portion of the lease.
FWIW, there is a type of car insurance endorsement that would protect a lessee who makes a large upfront payment on the lease. Allied calls their version the "New Car Replacement/Gap Coverage" endorsement. Their terms are that in the event your new car is totaled in the first three years of ownership, the payout will be sufficient to buy the new car then available closest to the totaled car, capped at 125% of the totaled car's actual cash value. I'm waiting to hear from my insurance agent how much that endorsement would cost me if I lease a Bolt.
Also, my agent tells me this (possibly California specific): with a normal car insurance policy, if a leased car is totaled, and the insurance payout exceeds the buyout cost of the lease, then the balance of the payout is made to the lessee. In which case leasing a car with a large down payment is no riskier than buying the car; in either case if the car is totaled while the car is very young, you are out the sales tax, registration fees, and drive-off depreciation on the car.
Of course, leasing a car with $0 drive-off and gap insurance does protect one from the above exposure, which is part of what makes leasing potentially appealing to me. I just wish that GM passed on the entire federal tax credit to the lessee as a capital cost reduction; since they don't, it doesn't seem to make any sense to lease a Bolt with the intention to buy it out at lease end.
Cheers, Wayne