GetOffYourGas
Well-known member
WetEV said:oilerlord said:flamaest said:CA already knows how much it's trucks weigh and they know trucks cause the most of the road damage. I would expect these costs to be distributed equally given that this weight data is already known to the DMV.
It isn't as simple as distributing the cost equally by weight. Changes like that have cause & effect. Look around...most everything around you, and what you consume was delivered by truck (including our EV's). Do you want to pay $8/pound for bananas and $40 for a bag of coffee? Freight companies won't simply absorb the cost of a substantial tax increase - it will be passed on to you and me.
If the wear that trucks cause is so expensive as to rise freight rates to make $40 coffee, then you will pay it one way or the other. Either with $40 coffee, or by paying taxes to fix the roads for the trucks. There is no free lunch, or free roads. Someone has to pay.
If it really does $40 in damage to move a bag of coffee, I doubt it, but it if did, it would be best put the cost on the activity doing the wear/damage so we see the real cost of the goods in the stores.
Right. And if trucks really paid their fair share, who knows - maybe rail would see a resurgence. It's time that we apply external costs to those who are causing them. Then and only then will the market pick the best solution.