d2170 said:Have GM scheduled a visit yet?
yes, here for 4+ hours and went over every detail, and now will be waiting for the outcome.
d2170 said:Have GM scheduled a visit yet?
mtndrew1 said:This all seems so implausible.
When you say you left the car and the doors locked automatically, did you verify by pulling a door handle to make sure they were locked? How are you certain they locked? Could the car have chirped to let you know that you shut the door and walked away while it was still running?
The way many of these systems work (FCA, BMW, etc) is that if you attempt to put the car in Park and fail to do so, it reverts to Neutral. This is what killed the young Star Trek actor Anton Yelchin.
Yelchin drove his Grand Cherokee to the top of his sloped driveway and with a shift mechanism similar to the Bolt, he thought he engaged Park. However the car was still either slightly moving while he tried to engage Park (imperceptible) or he failed to fully push the lever towards Park and the system put the car in Neutral. There is no visual or tactile cue that an FCA shifter like this has engaged a gear (much like the Bolt). He then walked down his driveway to get the mail and his Jeep was slowly and silently rolling backwards down the grade without him knowing. The Jeep rolled into him and crushed him against the mailbox. FCA has subsequently changed the Grand Cherokee shifter to a conventional PRNDL arrangement.
Can you try parking your car in the garage, putting it in Neutral (don't switch off the car), shutting the door, and walking away? My hypothesis here is that you didn't fully engage Park, forgot to shut off the car's power switch, shut the door, and then you walked away. The car chirped the horn to alert you of the problem and you assumed it was chirping to tell you the doors were locked. Like the Volt, after a period of time, the Bolt might shut off the ignition by itself if left in a running state unoccupied. The car would now be powered down and in Neutral, allowing for either slight movement or other outside influence, all the while you assumed the door was locked and the car was in Park.
Just a wild-ass guess.
mtndrew1 said:leodoggie said:It is all speculation at this point, but in your scenario of the car being left in neutral, how do you explain the crushed workbench, that took the car being left in reverse and hitting the workbench at some speed.
Just trying to eliminate variables here. I think the concept of the car turning itself on without keys, putting itself in reverse, and driving itself into a bench is borderline impossible.
If we can determine that the car could have been left running in Neutral and that the OP would have received the same auditory feedback that they assumed meant that car was locked, that means we have a car with nothing to prevent it from gently rolling or from being pushed without some sort of bizarre electrical gremlin starting the car and engaging a "gear" without keys. That's a pretty big distinction.
michael said:With regard to "user error", I originally assumed that the Toyota runaway problem was simply another example of "user error" until a close friend, very competent and calm, experienced it on the freeway with his entire family. He managed to bring the car to a halt with the engine still racing, he told me, shut it down, and never again purchased another Toyota product.
mtndrew1 said:roundpeg said:Blaming bad results on "user error" is becoming the generic excuse technologists use for foisting poorly designed systems on unsuspecting users. I see little practical difference between bugs and design concept errors.
I'm not dismissing that this could be a design fault and I'm of the general opinion that automakers should stop tinkering with such an important interface so well-understood by all drivers (PRNDL lever).
I'm not dismissing that this could be a design fault and I'm of the general opinion that automakers should stop tinkering with such an important interface so well-understood by all drivers (PRNDL lever).
Pigwich said:and I'm SURE they could still figure out a way to get the car in to park automatically even with a "real" gear shifter. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
SoCalif said:Here is a strange one, but seriously happened.
I was out of town (the only driver of the Bolt) I get a call saying there was a crash in the garage.
BOTH keys were out of the vehicle, car self locked and shut down in park from the previous night.
Wife heard a crash, goes to the garage and sees that the car backed up and ran into a work bench pushing in a wall.
granted, hard to believe, but both keys out of the car, she was in the house (no other drivers here), I was 40 miles away, and somehow the car moved????
Insurance called, dealership notified, GM messaged.
Just FYI
RussellL said:Where were the keys when this happened?
When did you notify GM, Jan 14th?
What day did GM inspect the car?
Shouldn't they have an answer by now?
Lithim said:Who is going to set the parking brake in their garage anyway, unless the floor is sloped.
Setting the parking brake first when parked on a slope will definitely take some strain off the gear shift mechanism when placing the vehicle in the "park" position.
And the Bolt Owner's Manual says so, too.Yes, it is best to set the parking brake before releasing the foot brake...
Yep. I guess that's why they call it a "Parking Brake."Yes, it is best to set the parking brake before releasing the foot brake, so that the parking brake is the primary means of holding the car, rather than the transmission.
dandrewk said:I don't get out of the Bolt (as a passenger) unless the PB is set. Otherwise, if the driver puts the car in park with foot on brake, the car will lurch forward when the brake is released. It barely moves, but is enough to tweak a firmly planted foot.
dan2112 said:I always set the brake when get out of the car - always.
Enter your email address to join: