JupiterMoon
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2016
- Messages
- 245
SeanNelson said:I gotta say that I'm finding all of these "nice but ugly" comments a bit off-putting. There are a ton of other ICE cars with a very similar look and form factor that never get hit with that kind of description. What is it about the Bolt that's drawing these kinds of comments?
JupiterMoon said:SeanNelson said:I gotta say that I'm finding all of these "nice but ugly" comments a bit off-putting. There are a ton of other ICE cars with a very similar look and form factor that never get hit with that kind of description. What is it about the Bolt that's drawing these kinds of comments?
For some reason people are hyper-critical of EVs.
And frankly to be honest, there really hasn't been an outstandingly good looking EV to date. Not even the Tesla Model S is a stunner IMO and is looking very outdated now.
As much as the article claims "buyers" only wanted "range and price and range,", I think that's utterly idiotic because a good looking vehicle sells. I don't know who these EV drivers are that GM pulled opinions from but style is an important factor in the marketing and sales of anything. I'd venture to say that EV's would have sold much better had automakers actually put effort into making their cars look attractive.
The Bolt isn't a bad looking vehicle IMO...but it doesn't stand out either. And EVs should stand out IMO in a good way not bad (like a Leaf, e.g).
devbolt said:JupiterMoon said:SeanNelson said:I gotta say that I'm finding all of these "nice but ugly" comments a bit off-putting. There are a ton of other ICE cars with a very similar look and form factor that never get hit with that kind of description. What is it about the Bolt that's drawing these kinds of comments?
For some reason people are hyper-critical of EVs.
And frankly to be honest, there really hasn't been an outstandingly good looking EV to date. Not even the Tesla Model S is a stunner IMO and is looking very outdated now.
As much as the article claims "buyers" only wanted "range and price and range,", I think that's utterly idiotic because a good looking vehicle sells. I don't know who these EV drivers are that GM pulled opinions from but style is an important factor in the marketing and sales of anything. I'd venture to say that EV's would have sold much better had automakers actually put effort into making their cars look attractive.
The Bolt isn't a bad looking vehicle IMO...but it doesn't stand out either. And EVs should stand out IMO in a good way not bad (like a Leaf, e.g).
Good looking is just one part of the equation here. Too much emphasis on it detracts from the engineering that is required to make it perform, both in terms of range, and utility. I think it's good that it looks just like another typical car out there because it shows that you can have a practical EV without it having to look like something out of a 70's science fiction movie or an exotic sports car.
I'm sure most knew about the higher range cars in the pipeline, but they didn't want to wait for them.
like2bike said:The ugly thing is ludicrous. It's like someone with a horse cart saying they won't buy a model-T because they think they're ugly.
Why does the Bolt have a grille(s)?
Eastocean said:Why does the Bolt have a grille(s)?
The Bolt has 3 cooling systems, so an airflow is needed. The cooling systems are for the cabin, the electric components in the drive system, and battery thermal management system. I learned this after seeing 3 radiator overflows under the hood.
Enter your email address to join: